![]() |
Welcome to Centre Training Services
|
|
Negotiations and Consensus Building
Delivered by
Many Centre Partners
A Two-Day Workshop
Workshop Purposes:
Negotiations and Consensus Building
To introduce participants to a common language, framework and skills for discussing negotiating structures, strategies and tactics –i.e., Principled-Centered Negotiations.
- To review the basic facilitator skills and understanding of Group Dynamics, the basics of the Rollercoaster of Change™ steps and the sequence that underlies all negotiations and consensus building.
- To conduct a self-assessment of the different approaches to each participant's “Social Communications Style” (Wilson Learning's) and its implications for each person's strengths and weaknesses in communications, consensus building and conflict management.
- To understand and learn the skills and appropriateness of consensus decision making and consensus building vs. other decision styles (Which is appropriate and when?).
- To clarify in negotiations, the roles of participants, the concepts of interestbased/ principle-centered vs. positional bargaining, the actual bargaining structure and strategies (with an emphasis on Win-Win bargaining and “Getting to Yes”), as well as knowing when not to negotiate.
- To understand and conduct a self-assessment of the different approaches to conflict resolution resulting from the research-based, and highly popular “Kilmann-Thomas Conflict Instrument” and theory.
- To also understand when it is appropriate to use each conflict management approach and how to flex your preferred communications style to respond appropriately for consensus building.
- Through case studies, to integrate all the above concepts, instruments, theories and skills into a new way for employees and management to conduct their business in a more open consultative and effective fashion.
Workshop Benefits:
Negotiations and Consensus Building
As a result of this workshop, you will be able to:
- Conduct a skillful negotiations process to achieve your aims.
- Resolve any conflict situation in which you find yourself.
- Skillfully facilitate conflict resolution between any two individuals or groups.
- Facilitate group consensus decision-making.
- Teach effective communications’ style and group dynamics to others.
Workshop Agenda:
Negotiations and Consensus Building
- Day 1 -
| Day 1 | Topics |
| 8:30 |
1. Join Up |
| 9:45 | Break |
| 10:00 | I = Review 3. Review Group Facilitation Techniques Subgroups (40 minutes)Round #1 Critique (20 minutes) |
| 11:00 | Break |
| 11:15 | Total Group Report Out (45 minutes), especially roles Tools—Tips—Techniques |
| 12:00 | Lunch |
| 1:00 | II = Begin Consensus 4. Social Styles Self Assessment Discuss ° Exercise by style (30 minutes) ° Critique (20 minutes)Round #2 ° Total group (25 minutes)report still in subgroups |
| 2:45 | Break |
| 3:00 | 4a. Tie Social Styles to Negotiations (1) WinLose (2) WinWin/Paradigm Shift 5. Decision Making/Consensus Building Subgroups (40 minutes) Critique (15 minutes)Round #3 |
| 4:00 | Break |
| 4:15 | Total group (30 minutes) ToolsTipsTechniques |
| 5:00 | 6. Homework Read Section 3, pages 1-30 (Principle Centered Negotiations) |
- Day 2 -
| Day 2 | Topics |
| 8:00 | 1. Day One IssuesTwo cases set up (two leaders/one observer each) III = Begin Negotiations 2. Negotiating Framework/PlanPlan Lecturette |
| 9:30 | Break |
| 9:45 | 3. Principle-Centered Negotiations (Win/Win) Demo Ethical Persuasion Select Phrase Subgroup of five/roles clearRound #4/4A Work Plan Development |
| 10:15 | 3a. Switch roles and repeat process |
| 11:30 | Lunch |
| 12:30 | 4. Conflict Management Kilmann-Thomas Instrument/discussion Subgroups by Styleoptional if time (do more cases if desired) ° When to use [+/-] (25 minutes) ° Critique (15 minutes)Round #5 ° Report out (15 minutes)still in subgroups |
| 2:00 | Break |
| 2:15 | 5. Tie Conflict Management to Social Styles and Win-Win Negotiations to your day-to-day job |
| 2:45 | IV = Case Study Integration (a must do!) 6. Select two cases to use from participants and the process to use with two leaders for each case and one observerRound #6 Set up both cases/sidesself-select Use facilitationcritique process Then total group discussion/applications |
| 3:45 | Break |
| 4:00 | V = Learning Application 7. Go back to Wantsreview them 8. ToolsTipsTechniques summary (go around room) Learning Applicationwhat one thing will I do in the next 72 hours |
| 4:30 | 9. Summary Evaluation, Close |
Workshop Participant Notebook
Negotiations and Consensus Building
Table of Contents
|
Part |
Topic |
I. |
1. Ground Rules 2. Six Rounds of Experiential Learning 3. Negotiations and Consensus Building Process 4. Parallel Involvement Process 5. Meetings Management–Team Building 6. Rollercoaster of Change™ 7. Facilitation Skills |
| II. | 8. Social Styles Recognition 9. Decision Making |
| III. | 10. Negotiations 11. Ethical Persuasion |
| IV. | 12. Conflict Management 13. Pinch Theory and Triangulation 14. Responsibility Charting |
| V. | 15. Learning Applications 16. Confronting Dysfunctional Behavior 17. Communications 18. Participant Evaluation |
Workshop Participant Testimonials
Negotiations and Consensus Building
How effective was this workshop in meeting its objectives?
- The practices/workshops were outstanding.
- It's real. Learn the process while you take part. We participated in the process to learn the process. Outstanding!
- Information presented in clear, simple manner with participation of those attending.
- Lots of new concepts and ideas that should increase success. Role-playing was very effective.
- The workshop followed a logical sequence that built support for the goals of the workshop from its outset. From a 'prisoner' at 8:30 on the first day, I went to being an 'eager participant' by the first coffee break. Snappy timetable, multiple activities. Everyone was involved.
- I did not volunteer for this but now realize that I should have. It was an excellent course and met its objective fully.
- Excellent course!
- Fast moving pace.
- In the last year I had identified this type of course as the one that I had wanted to take. It exceeded my expectations!
- Participation, action–not just telling.
- Good introduction to a complex subject. A lot of real life (work/home) applications.
- It changed my basic approach to negotiating.
- Super course–will be useful at work and home.
- This course should be mandatory for all government employees!!
- Good mix of theory/practice.
How effective were the facilitators?
- Good role models.
- Outstanding!
- Clear, good notes/materials.
- Both facilitators appeared well versed in the subject and offered many insights.
- Despite the presence of some problem characters, no one was able to monopolize the workshop.
- Excellent at putting people at ease.
- Excellent course.
- High energy moving the topics along and effectively.
- Good delivery, presentation of material encourages participation from all.
- Always prepared, supportive and humorous.
- Experienced not just academic.
- Humor, examples, informative.
- Great job. Thanks for what are sure to be useful life skills. Excellent ability to respond to questions and adapt general rules to specific examples.
- Excellent personality for the task and knowledge of the subject.
- Personable.
- Well presented. Lots of participation and listening.
- Enthusiastic. Structured material well.
- Able to provide many examples from real life. Humor used throughout. Goals for course defined with assistance of group and followed throughout the two days.
- Exceptionally well versed in the materials and made themselves easily understood.



